|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Get
Our FREE Working Resources Newsletter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Going Global: Are You Ready?
The marketplace as well as the workplace is increasingly multicultural
and diverse. Never before have people been required to work together
with colleagues and customers from so many different countries
and worldviews.
More products and services are being consumed outside of their
country of origin than ever before, thus increasing global competition.
In addition, organizations are outsourcing offshore in order to
stay competitive. Many functions are being shifted to India, the
Philippines, Malaysia, Russia and other countries, because of low
labor costs, the availability of highly-educated workers and the
stabilization of technology.
From the U.S. alone, Forrester Research predicts the migration
of 3.3 million service and knowledge-based jobs overseas by the
year 2015, 70 percent predicted to move to India.
As opportunities for global expansion increase, so does the trend
toward more diversity in the workplace. Successful companies are
recruiting professionals with different backgrounds, cultures,
styles and motivations. Yet this great resource presents increased
possibilities for misunderstanding and cultural blunders.
It is obvious that organizations will need to expand the capacity
for people to handle the challenges of working with other cultures
if they are to participate successfully. Those companies that continue
to struggle with domestic diversity will find themselves even more
challenged.
Leaders must be flexible and be able to adapt to this diverse
workforce and global consumers. This requires an understanding
of the historical, political and economic references of people.
Leaders must understand differences in worldviews, communication
styles, ethics and etiquette of the people they deal with, both
internally and externally.
When Cultures Collide
According to Richard D. Lewis (When
Cultures Collide: Managing Successfully Across Cultures, 2000),
the world¡¯s several
hundred national and regional cultures can be put into three groups:
Linear-active: These are the task-oriented planners such as the
Germans, Swedes, Swiss, Americans and the Dutch. In these cultures,
people focus on a scheduled timeline and like to do one thing at
a time.
Multi-active: These
are people-oriented cultures that are more focused on interactions
and dialogues, such as the Italians, French, Spanish, Mexicans,
Portuguese and Arabs. They don¡¯t
care as much about schedules or timelines. Meetings may run long;
the priorities are the relationships that come from them.
Reactive: These are the more introverted cultures. They are respect-oriented
listeners such as the Japanese, Chinese, Finns and Southeast Asians.
They like to concentrate on what a speaker is saying and rarely
interrupt. They often speak in monologues and may express ideas
using a passive voice.
This simple perspective can help one to begin to understand basic
differences in ways of doing business in foreign countries. However,
one must be cautious to avoid working with unverified assumptions.
According to Charles M. Hampden-Turner and Fons Trompenaars, in
their book Building Cross-Cultural Competence (Yale University
Press, 2000), there are six dimensions to consider when doing business
with a foreign culture.
1 |
Universalism
versus Particularism: This is the degree to which a society
emphasizes sameness or not. Those that do, value following
rules, codes and laws. Those that don¡¯t value
sameness believe that laws may or may not apply, depending
on mitigating circumstances and friendships.
Of 46 countries surveyed, respondents in predominately Protestant,
stable democracies (Switzerland, the U.S., Canada, Sweden,
Australia, the U.K., and the Netherlands) stated that it
is more important to follow the law than to protect a friend.
Respondents in Catholic countries (Brazil, Spain, Poland,
France, Mexico, Cuba and Venezuela) stated that it is more
important to help a friend than to uphold a law when the
two are in conflict. Those in Buddhist, Confucian, Hindu
and Shinto countries (South Korea, China, Indonesia, Nepal,
Japan and Singapore) side even more towards defending a friendship
than upholding the law.
|
2 |
Individualism
versus Communitarianism: This is the degree to which a society
values competition, self-reliance, self-interest and personal
growth versus cooperation, social concern, altruism, public
service and societal legacy.
Individualist business cultures see profit, pension-fund
management, market share and teamwork differently than Communitarian
cultures. Communitarian business cultures see teamwork as
a social goal and a business goal. Individualist business
cultures view teamwork as a path toward more profit. |
3 |
Specificity
versus Diffuseness: Relationships can be either diffuse or
specific. In a diffuse relationship, a manager¡¯s
authority would extend beyond the office. In social situations,
the manager would be expected to maintain superiority. In a
specific relationship, the manager would act like one of the
gang once they were out of the office and into a social environment. |
4 |
Achieved
Status versus Ascribed Status: Reputation can be either achieved
or ascribed. If it is achieved, it has been earned through
action. Ascribed status is attached to lineage. Universalist
countries such as the U.S. and Australia lean toward achieved
status while Particularist countries such as Korea, Japan and
France lean toward ascribed status. |
5 |
Inner
Direction versus Outer Direction: This is the degree to which
a society values inner direction and personal freedom versus
an outer direction, such as the beauty and power of nature
in the environment and in relationships. American managers
are the most inner-directed and believe that they are masters
of their fates. Managers in other countries may perceive this
in a negative way, believing that Americans are not concerned
with others or the consequences of their actions on the whole
group. |
6 |
SequentialTime
versus Synchronous Time:Sequential time is clock time. Synchronous
time is cyclical time or what is called ¡°good timing.¡± All
societies have particular ways of organizing themselves in
relationship to time. For countries that are sequential in
their time-orientation, time is money and there is only so
much time available before it runs out. In other countries
where time is not linear, life is a dance. |
Different Ways of Doing Business
Imagine the conflicts that can arise when these cultures with
different priorities try to work together. They exist on a different
timeline and often irritate each other. People from a data-oriented
culture (Swedes, Germans, and Americans) like to get information
by doing research before they act. By contrast; dialogue-oriented
people (French, Spanish, Arabian), gain much of their information
through a network of personal contacts.
Other major differences occur in the way that cultures view leadership,
status, and time and the ways in which they communicate.
Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Scandinavian
cultures are especially time-dominated, equating time with money.
Asian cultures see time as cyclic and unfolding in due course.
The Japanese, for example, are
less concerned with how long something takes to happen than with
dividing time for ¡°properness, courtesy and tradition.¡±
Organizations are structured by two
primary leadership styles ¨C
either with a task or a networking orientation. A task-oriented
leader focuses on tackling issues, designing strategies, distributing
tasks and promoting efficiency. A network-oriented leader is concerned
with the status of the leader, chain of command and motivating
employees. Managers who are task-oriented prioritize technical
competence, value facts and logic, and are results-oriented. Managers
in network-oriented cultures tend to be more extroverted and to
rely on their ability to persuade and inspire.
American managers can be assertive, aggressive and goal-oriented.
They may value individual freedom, but exercise teamwork and show
corporate spirit. German and British managers value punctuality,
orderliness, written procedures and unambiguous instructions. In
Asia, managers motivate workers to improve by appealing to the
reputation and prestige of the group.
There is no set of cultural perspectives that is right or wrong.
To take a judgmental stance or to try to convince others that a
particular way is better for business will not work. People cannot
negate their worldviews. Managers must seek to understand and accept
what is in place and work within a different set of perspectives.
American managers must accept that although American English may
be the language of business, it does not mean that business should
be done the American way.
One Size Does Not Fit All
Change initiatives and new strategies should be approached with
strong local leadership and input. Leaders from headquarters should
meet with local leaders to listen and learn.
Global communications present some
interesting challenges. The English
use understatement and reservations; they may be vague in order
to avoid confrontation and to be polite. Spaniards, French, and
Italians use language to be eloquent and expressive. Germans
use logic. American speech tends to be direct and to the point.
The Japanese use words that can sound like diplomatic platitudes,
while their tone, gestures and body language convey what they
are really saying. Hard negotiating may be veiled in pleasantries,
which can mislead the Westerner. In Asian cultures, ¡°yes¡± may
mean ¡°I understand¡± ©¤ and
not ¡°I agree.¡±
Notions of etiquette differ. There is no such thing as international
etiquette as each culture sees its own as the norm. Appreciating
diversity means understanding both the big and little things that
help form a unique culture.
Leaders and managers need to clearly
understand their own preferences.They also must recognize and
accommodate other people¡¯s
preferences, (even if they cannot see their advantages), rather
than trying to change them. There
are many different methods, positions and styles with which people
can accomplish goals and succeed in today¡¯s business
environment. Leaders, who can effectively understand, appreciate
and motivate colleagues from multiple cultures, generations, regions
and countries will become increasingly effective as business evolves
in this century.
Leveraging Cultural Diversity
Leaders and executives in organizations must broaden their framework
of diversity to include the cultures ©¤ both domestically
and abroad ©¤ with whom they do business, (including
race, religions, genders, national customs, age and generational
differences). Leaders must also realize there are a variety of
ways in which people work (communication styles, negotiation
skills, relationship to time and status).
As this century evolves, it becomes
increasingly important for leaders to be open-minded and flexible,
with a high degree of emotional intelligence, if they are to
be effective. They must still
produce results. This requires the ability to manage the tension
that arises when people from different cultures don¡¯t
see eye-to-eye.
Organizations and their leaders are responsible for encouraging
multi-cultural awareness. To facilitate this, it is necessary to
enable discussion of differences through the use of neutral descriptors
and vocabulary, so that people can address cultural differences
and experiences in a way that is non-judgmental and non-threatening.
It may be necessary to expand current diversity awareness training
and workshops to include global perspectives. The services of coaches
and consultants can help employees and leaders learn about other
perspectives and human differences.
People must move beyond simply accepting cultural identities and
differences to a place where they can be leveraged for competitive
advantage, superior performance and creative growth. There is tremendous
creative energy and innovation that can be harnessed when people
from different perspectives work successfully together.
Global business is challenging in large part because cultural
habits and attitudes blind people to other ways of doing things
and make them unwilling or unable to change.
Going Global Resources
• |
Althen,
G. (2002). American Ways: A Guide for Foreigners in the United
States. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press. |
• |
Cox,
T. Jr. & Beale, R.L. (1997) Developing Competency to Manage
Diversity: Readings, Cases and Activities. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. |
• |
Goldsmith,
M., Greenberg, C.L., Robertson, A., & Hu-Chan, M. (2003).
Global Leadership: the Next Generation. Upper Saddle River,
N.J.: Financial Times Prentice Hall. |
• |
Gundling,
E. (2003). Working GlobeSmart: 12 People Skills for Doing Business
Across Borders. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black. |
• |
Hampden-Turner,
C.M. & Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building Cross-Cultural
Competence: How to Create Wealth from Conflicting Values. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press. |
• |
Lee,
C. (2003) Cowboys and Dragons: Shattering Cultural Myths to
Advance Chinese-American Business. Chicago IL: Dearborn Trade
Publishing. |
• |
Lewis,
R. D. (2000) When Cultures Collide:Managing Successfully Across
Cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Nicholas Brealey. |
• |
Marquardt,
M. J. & Horvath, L. (2001). Global Teams: How Top Multinationals
Span Boundaries and Cultures with High-Speed Teamwork. Davies
Black. |
• |
Marx,
E. (1999). Breaking Through Culture Shock: What You Need to
Succeed in International Business. Yarmouth, ME: Nicholas Brealey
Publishing. |
• |
Rosensweig,
J. (1998). Winning the Global Game: A Strategy for Linking
People and Profits. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc. |
• |
Thomas,
D.A. & Ely, R.J. ((1996 September/October). Making Differences
Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity. Harvard Business
Review. Reprint Number 2195. |
• |
Trompenaars,
F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture:
Understanding Diversity in Global Business. Yarmouth, ME: Nicholas
Brealey. |
Working
Resources is a Leadership Consulting, Training and Executive Coaching
Firm Helping Companies Assess, Select, Coach and Retain Emotionally
Intelligent People; Emotional Intelligence-Based Interviewing and
Selection; Multi-Rater 360-Degree Feedback; Career Coaching; Change
Management; Corporate Culture Surveys and Executive Coaching.
Dr. Maynard Brusman
Consulting Psychologist and Executive Coach
Trusted Advisor to Senior Leadership Teams
Subscribe to Working Resources FREE E-mail Newsletter.
E-mail:mbrusman@workingresources.com . Type Subscribe Newsletter.
Voice: 415-546-1252 Web:www.workingresources.com
E-mail This Article to a Collegue...
Return
to Professional Effectiveness Articles Index
|
|