Are You Ready for the Future?
“Discovering the future…is a far less amazing skill
than inventing it. The thing discovered already exists; you simply
see it before most others do. Often it is a new piece of technology
that makes it possible for something to happen on a large scale.
So, find a direction things are moving in and spell out the ultimate
logic or conclusion. If you are right, there will be early examples
of the thing already around. You are not creating the trend, you
are simply spotting it before others.”
– Stan Davis, Lessons from the Future, 2001
Is your organization looking forward, or is it focused on the
problems of the present and immediate short-term competition? What
occupies your senior management team? Are they issues of the present,
or are you getting ready for a changing future?
How will your organization create new rules of competition in
the future? Is it imagining new ways of doing business, building
new capabilities, and setting new standards of customer satisfaction?
Is it alert to possible risks from unconventional rivals, new business
models, changing demographics, and global uncertainties?
It is no longer a question of being able to operate lean and mean.
Trimming jobs and cutting costs, while important tasks, will not
put you and your company into a front running position for industry
leadership of the future.
Here are three questions to ask senior management to evaluate
readiness for the future:
1. |
What
percentage of your time do you spend on external, rather than
internal, issues? Do you understand the implications of new
technology that is affecting your industry? Or are you debating
corporate overhead allocations? |
2. |
When
you are spending time looking outward, do you consider how
the world could be different in five or ten years? Or are you
more concerned with landing the next big contract or responding
to competitors’ pricing? |
3. |
How
much of your time is devoted to looking outward and forward?
Are you consulting with colleagues to create a shared vision
of the future based on risk evaluations as opposed to a personal
and idiosyncratic view? |
These questions were posed by Gary Hamel and C. K. Prahalad in
their book Competing for the Future over ten years ago. The book
merits re-reading as it is even more relevant today.
Why Leaders Don’t Look Ahead
Most leaders of organizations do not
spend sufficient time considering the future. It
may be in part because the answers are not easy—no
one can know for sure what the future will bring. Globalization
and rapidly changing technologies are only part of the uncertain
future. One must also consider fluctuations in world politics,
natural resources, and industry regulations.
Many leaders don’t want to look
into the future because to do so is unsettling. They must admit
that what they know today may be irrelevant and obsolete for
the future. The knowledge and experience that brought them this
far in their careers may not be sufficient.
When this happens, according to Hamel
and Prahalad, “…the
urgent drives out the important; the future goes largely unexplored;
and the capacity to act, rather than the capacity to think and
imagine, becomes the sole measure of leadership.”
Looking at the Wrong Things
This leads to focusing attention on internal issues of restructuring
and reengineering to shore up present day business rather than
creating the future. But neither will ensure continued success
if a company fails to regenerate its core strategies.
According to Hamel and Prahalad, “Any company that succeeds
at restructuring and reengineering, but fails to create the markets
of the future, will find itself on a treadmill, trying to keep
one step ahead of the steadily declining margins and profits of
yesterday’s business.”
In 1989 there was a survey of U.S.
managers who believed that quality would be a fundamental source
of competitive advantage in the year 2000. On
the other hand, barely half of Japanese managers predicted quality
to be a source of advantage in the year 2000. The Japanese managers
rated first as a source of competitive advantage in the year
2000 the capacity to create fundamentally new products and businesses.
This doesn’t
mean that the Japanese turn their backs on quality, only that
it is no longer a competitive differentiator.
Too many companies are focusing on creating advantage through
quality, time-to-market, and customer responsiveness. These are
prerequisites for survival, not competitive advantages for the
future.
Risks and Opportunities in an Uncertain World
According to Paul A. Laudicina, managing
director of A. T. Kearney’s
Business Policy Council, there is a way to look at future business
environments and evaluate risks and opportunities that might evolve.
Laudicina, in his new book World
Out of Balance (McGraw Hill, 2005), argues that today’s
earth-shattering events are fundamentally different from those
of previous eras of history.
Technologies are collapsing distance and we now have unprecedented
global interdependence. Only a disciplined strategy will embolden
corporate management to engage the world and seize the many opportunities
it presents.
Five Drivers of Change
Laudicina’s framework for looking
at future business scenarios is based on his identification of
five primary drivers of change:
1. Globalization
2. Demographics
3. The new consumer
4. Natural resources and the environment
5. Regulation and activism
It used to be that large global companies such as Royal Dutch/Shell
had sophisticated risk management and strategic planning departments
to evaluate opportunities as well as vulnerabilities to social
and political unrest, economic upheaval, and natural disasters
overseas.
Corporate restructuring has taken the
scissors to strategic planning departments. The
rapid expansion of global opportunities has led many leaders
to believe that careful planning isn’t necessary. “Just
do it” becomes the global manifesto. As a result, most companies
today lack the means to identify and manage external risks.
Most companies can and should expand, as the most promising opportunities
are located outside home markets. In order to spot and act on new
opportunities and avoid emerging threats, however, it is necessary
to consider the five drivers that are most likely to shape the
business environment in the future.
To do this, take each driver and plot three scenarios, ranging
from most conservative environment to most liberal. Evaluate the
consequences on your business if each of these scenarios should
evolve over the next five years. Plan for the consequences and
be ready.
What makes this era of globalization truly unique is how inexpensive
and powerful technology has become. But if governments continue
to fail to implement universal standards, corporations will find
themselves in an increasingly complex quagmire of regional and
national regulations. This will curtail their ability to expand
markets abroad and limit the opportunities technologies offer to
underserved populations.
Globalization
By the end of the 20th century, nearly 63,000 multinational corporations
were operating worldwide. Technologies play an increasingly important
part in the ability to operate globally. Rapid transport, sophisticated
logistics, and instantaneous communications allow for increasingly
complex interactions.
Financial markets further complicate how business is run internationally.
A financial crisis in one part of the globe can be devastating,
as are fluctuating currencies. German automaker Volkswagen reported
losses of $1.5 billion in 2003 due to volatile dollar-euro exchange
rates.
Demographics
Until recently, only 2 to 3 percent
of the global population has lived long enough to become senior
citizens for most of human history. The
World Bank now predicts that 16 percent of the global population—more
than 1 billion people—will be over 60 years old by 2030.
In wealthy industrialized countries, this benchmark will be reached
much sooner: Germany in 2006, France and Britain in 2016, the U.S.
in 2021, and Canada in 2023.
What does this mean for your business? Again, ask the questions
about how your products and services will play out in three different
environments ranging from conservative to liberal.
The New Consumer
Future global economic growth will significantly influence the
levels of wealth and purchasing power among consumers in different
countries. The first scenario to consider is weak economic growth
worldwide, or a recession, or an economy disrupted by unpredictable
events. This would restrain the rise of the global middle class
in emerging markets and elsewhere.
Natural Resources
The majority of the world’s population enjoys relative water
sufficiency, but 5 percent experiences water scarcity and another
5 percent suffers from “water stress.”
An estimated 1.6 billion people or 25 percent of the global population
does not have access to electricity or gasoline. A lack of energy
perpetuates the cycle of poverty, while access drives economic
growth. The International Energy Agency predicts that the global
demand for energy will grow by two-thirds by 2030.
When there is little in the way of
international cooperation and countries rely on their own unique
assets, the world becomes increasingly polarized between the
haves and have-nots. This would
drive the U.S. to safeguard its supply through military interventions
in Middle Eastern countries. The European Union would depend
on Russian resources and other “rogue states” such
as Iran. As Asia struggles to meet its energy needs, its economic
development would slow.
Regulation and Activism
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development estimated
that since the end of 2003, spam constituted 50 percent of all
e-mail messages in circulation and cost as much as $20.5 billion
in wasted technical resources. As a result, governments worldwide
are implementing an increasing amount of legislation.
Information technology has become a target for new rounds of regulation
because growing security concerns have given institutions a free
hand to deal with national security issues. A host of new discoveries
and developments in science and technology is confounding existing
regulations and rendering old ways of doing business irrelevant.
Keys to Creating Success for the Future
Value-building companies that find creative ways to address broad
social concerns and cooperate with interest groups may be better
positioned for future success than those with a single-minded pursuit
of the bottom line.
Taking the time to creatively evaluate potential risks and opportunities
is the key to creating and maintaining a successful future.
Futurist Thinking
Futurist Stan Davis, author of many books including Lessons from
the Future (2001), looks at beginning trends and predicts endings.
If one can look at trends as having a life cycle, then the endings
become clearer. Economies do not end when they run out of whatever
is driving them but are replaced when another more powerful driver
arrives.
The information age began in 1953 with the first computers and
reached a midpoint in the mid-1990s when computers went from freestanding
machines to interconnected ones. As the speed of change has accelerated,
the second half of the information economy can be seen as lasting
into the 2020s.
Davis proposes a similar economic cycle
driven by biotechnology. It began
in 1953 with Crick and Watson’s
discovery of the double helix structure of DNA and reached a
slow growth first quarter with the completion of the Human Genome
Project in June 2000. The first half will be reached in the late
2020s. Biotechnology and genomics will be a major dominant driver
of the economy of the future.
Another trend is in the area of measurements.
Financial readings used to be done annually, then quarterly,
and now monthly. In 1990 Cisco Systems began measuring daily
in order to close its worldwide financial books daily and in
one hour’s notice by 2000. This
continual measurement means that accounting is no longer a historical
ledger but an operating tool that can be used to respond to threats
and opportunities in real time. It can be implemented to cause
outcomes rather than react to them.
The ability to think in terms of life cycles of dominant drivers
will help you see the possible trends and open up your thinking
to create new perspectives rather than just new products and services.
Recommended Reading:
Davis, S. M. (2001). Lessons from the Future. Capstone Publishing
Ltd.
Gibson, R., ed. (1998). Rethinking the Future. Nicholas Brealey
Publishing.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future.
Harvard Business School Press.
Laudicina, P. A. (2005). World Out of Balance. McGraw Hill.
Working
Resources is a Leadership Consulting, Training and Executive Coaching
Firm Helping Companies Assess, Select, Coach and Retain Emotionally
Intelligent People; Emotional Intelligence-Based Interviewing and
Selection; Multi-Rater 360-Degree Feedback; Career Coaching; Change
Management; Corporate Culture Surveys and Executive Coaching.
Dr. Maynard Brusman
Consulting Psychologist and Executive Coach
Trusted Advisor to Senior Leadership Teams
Subscribe to Working Resources FREE E-mail Newsletter.
E-mail:mbrusman@workingresources.com . Type Subscribe Newsletter.
Voice: 415-546-1252 Web:www.workingresources.com
E-mail This Article to a Collegue...
Return
to Professional Effectiveness Articles Index
|